前裁判谈布鲁日进球被吹:确实存在对什琴斯尼的犯规(前裁判评布鲁日进球被判无效:确有对什琴斯尼的犯规)

avo

Analyzing Match Rules

I’m thinking about the match between Juventus and Club Brugge. Juventus usually competes in Serie A and Europe, but these two teams rarely meet except in friendlies. If Szczesny plays for Juventus in 2024-25, perhaps it could be a summer friendly? I should avoid guessing specifics without knowing for sure. Instead, I can talk generally about VAR reviews and what constitutes fouls against goalkeepers, like impeding with contact or illegal use of arms.Explaining VAR Decisions

![tfr](/assets/images/BBBF2089.JPEG)

I'm explaining that the threshold for overturning an on-field decision is based on a "clear and obvious" standard. If a goal is awarded, VAR checks for evidence to confirm it. There's a difference between "playing in the GK line" and legal blocking, which includes factors like distance to the goalkeeper and contact made. I can offer options for the user: would they prefer a quick breakdown of the laws or a recap of a specific match? If they have a clip, I can help find the exact play.Providing a Short Analysis

I want to consider the network mode and established guidelines, which suggest assuming a workspace-write and network-enabled situation while avoiding browsing unless specifically asked. So, I could create a short analysis in bullet points:

![ARDe](/assets/images/732E43F3.jpg)
  • The law involved is Law 12, which covers fouls and misconduct related to goalkeepers.
  • VAR protocol requires a "clear and obvious" threshold for overturning goals.
  • Typical fouls include backing into or holding the GK, illegal screens, or blocking with extended arms.
  • Edge cases might involve minimal contact or situations where an attacker is offside but still interferes.

I should then check with the user: do they want me to pull a clip for frame-by-frame analysis or just a summary of statements from ex-referees? I'll keep it concise.Crafting the Response

Okay, I want to acknowledge that these decisions typically revolve around protecting the goalkeeper and determining interference lines. I’ll list 4-5 bullet points for clarity:

  • Basis: Law 12 from the competition rules; defining the goalkeeper's control, such as touching the ball with their hands.
  • Typical actions constituting a foul.
  • VAR intervention logic and considerations for the goal line area.
  • Conditions under which a goal may be deemed valid.
  • Offer options: If you have footage, I can help analyze it frame by frame, or I can look up details about this decision if you want me to access the network.

Let's make sure I'm keeping it general regarding the match context!

要点梳理(为何会判对什琴斯尼犯规)

  • 规则依据:竞赛规则第12条(犯规与不当行为)。常见点是“阻碍对手(伴随接触)”“冲撞门将”“拉拽/抱摔”,以及门将对球的控制定义(哪怕一只手按住或托住球,都算控制)。
  • 典型犯规特征:用手臂/身体顶住门将致其无法起跳或出拳;两手接触并明显推移门将;背身卡位但有持续用力向门将挤压;压住/钩住门将手臂;借门将“做梯子”起跳。
  • VAR介入逻辑:若场上判进球,VAR需找到“清晰且明显”的进攻方犯规证据才会改判;若场上已判犯规在先,VAR通常只会“确认”而非推翻除非有明显相反证据。
  • 门前对抗的判尺度:规则并未给予门将在小禁区内“额外特权”,但由于空中对抗的脆弱性,实务中对门将的轻微持续性推搡/阻挡更容易被吹。
  • 常见边界情形:门将主动撞上静止进攻者一般不构成进攻方犯规;纯粹肩并肩、无手臂外张、无位移的轻微接触可能被放行;但若影响门将起跳路线/手臂摆动,多数会判犯规并取消进球。

需要我:

  1. 找到这次具体回合与前裁判的原话并做要点摘录;或
  2. 你给我视频片段,我按画面逐帧说明哪些动作触发了犯规判定。